William Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing - 1516 Words

Danielle Silfies An Issue of Deception and Morality In William Shakespeare s play Much Ado About Nothing, many characters lack moral values and use deception as a tool to get a conclusion that they desire. Deceit is a concept that most of the characters experience in some form throughout the play. It is used to get Benedick and Beatrice to realize their feeling of love and admiration for each other. It is also used to pull characters like Claudio and Hero apart multiple times. Deceit is used in both positive and negative ways, depending on the distributor. The use of deceit is really the way that people lose their moral standing by allowing themselves to get to a conclusion faster or gain an outcome that they could not if they had not used deception. In Much Ado About Nothing, the love story between Beatrice and Benedick only flourishes through the use of deceit. Claudio and party are trying to play matchmaker for Benedick and Beatrice. Deceit is a morality issue. Even though the characters in the play have the best intentions they are still lying. Claudio, Don Pedro, and Leonato tell each other false facts about Beatrice s Love toward Benedick knowing that Benedick is eavesdropping. Claudio tells Don Pedro and Leonato that Hero said that Beatrice said that surely she will die (II.iii.175) if he love her not (II.iii.176). This is deceitful because the entire group knows that Hero did not hear this and Beatrice never spoke it. Deceit is the act ofShow MoreRelatedWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing1204 Words   |  5 PagesI will be considering the role of the villain in Much Ado About Nothing, and will conduct rhetorical analyses that will proceed to view the perspective of the villain and his or her intentions. M uch Ado About Nothing written by William Shakespeare intending this play to be a comedy. Although it is hard to comprehend the comedy within the play. The characters within this play are all linked together by having a relationship that looks like a telephone wire game. The characters dilemma develops anRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing2083 Words   |  9 Pagesin the end, there are millions of ways that each individual defines love according to their experiences. One individual in particular is Shakespeare, who is widely known for expressing the significance of love in various plays of his, as he portrays several branches of love such as friendship, parental love, and romantic love. In Much Ado about Nothing, Shakespeare demonstrates the ways in which Claudio and Hero’s love shows the triumph of imagination over intelligence compared to Benedick and Beatrice’sRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing898 Words   |  4 PagesBeatrice, Benedick, and Love in Much Ado About Nothing William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing is set in thirteenth century Italy. The plot of the play can be categorized as comedy or tragicomedy . Villainy and scheming combine with humor and sparkling wordplay in Shakespeare s comedy of manners. Claudio is deceived into believing that Hero, is unfaithful. Meanwhile, Benedick and Beatrice have a kind of merry war between them, matching wits in repartee. This paper will attempt toRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing1317 Words   |  6 PagesMuch to Do About Noting Deceit is the act of concealing or misrepresenting the truth. Deceit plays an important role in the plot of Shakespeare’s play Much Ado about Nothing. It also has a large influence on the relationships of the play. Much Ado about Nothing is a play written by William Shakespeare who is widely considered the greatest dramatist of all time. William Shakespeare was baptized on April 26, 1564, in Stratford-upon-Avon, England. From roughly 1594 onward he was an important memberRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing3289 Words   |  14 PagesSection One Title Analysis: As an author, William Shakespeare had titles ranging from the light at heart and ethereal to the rigid and formal. The title, Much Ado About Nothing, is one such title that fits very neatly into his light at heart category. However this doesn t mean that the title doesn t reflect the story as in Shakespeare s other plays. His light at heart stories have titles that are just as reflective as his more serious titles. The title is an obvious indicator of the story thatRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing And Hamlet1503 Words   |  7 Pagesthoughts, well-being, actions, and interactions with the other set roles. William Shakespeare’s plays included dissimilar characters and different methods of characterization. The two plays that will be compared and contrasted are William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing and Hamlet. As for the characters from each play, Beatrice, Benedict, Don John, Don Pedro, Claudio, and Hero will be assessed from Much Ado About Nothing and from Hamlet, Hamlet, Claudius, Gertrude, Polonius, Laertes, and OpheliaRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing768 Words   |  4 Pagesshares many similarities with the production from Shakespeare’s time, however they markedly differ. There are indeed many differences, for example, language, gender roles, and venue. These differences would change the retelling of Much Ado About Nothing in Shakespeare times because of its modern production. First, language absolutely would have played a vital role in Shakespeare’s time. Today Shakespeare’s words have massively changed and lost its meaning in modern retelling theatre. The pronunciationRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing3544 Words   |  15 PagesWhen examining the plays written by Shakespeare there are many instances where the common theme of marriage is shows. In the times of the 1600’s the ceremony of marriage was very common and done in a very orderly and strict fashion. In those time there was no aspects of a genuine love and heart felt marriage but instead they were seen as an agreement between the two parties. In many of the works of Shakespeare many characters deal with the issue of marriage and you begin to see the toll if had onRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing1784 Words   |  8 Pagesis a witty, talkative character in Much Ado about Nothing. She is cousin to Hero, and also a close friend, however, s he and Hero are very much dissimilar, as Hero is a gentle and quiet young woman. She has a very sarcastic and joking nature. We can tell a lot from her first line. She says, ‘I pray you, is Signor Montanto returned from the wars or no?’ The pun used tells us that she has a wit and a joking manner. Also, we soon find out that she is talking about Benedick, therefore, giving us a hintRead MoreWilliam Shakespeare s Much Ado About Nothing Essay1971 Words   |  8 PagesTransition in Much Ado About Nothing William Shakespeare’s Much Ado About Nothing, a comedy filled with differences between genders, witty banter between memorable characters Benedick and Beatrice, a plot of revenge that involves one character faking her death and let’s not forget the masquerade marriage that comes to readers at the end. Much Ado About Nothing, court politics while still maintain a profound amount of humor and wit. However, it is the honor and shame that is prominent in Much Ado About Nothing

An Analysis Of The Iliad - 996 Words

The Iliad, is a powerful poem that’s been translated and rewritten for many years to inspire the power that women in everyday lives. The women that we are faced in â€Å"The Iliad† are very confident and brave. The power that we see among different women in the book is very unique because each person plays a different role to make themselves stand out in a particular way. We see how the main conflict of the book is all about a women named Helen. She is mainly known as the Helen of Troy. The battle between the Achaeans and the Trojans started because Paris stole Helen from Menelaus who was her husband and that’s when everything got mixed up. According to the article, â€Å"In raising these questions of commensurability around the figure of Helen, Dr Faustus provides entry into the Iliad s own troubled representation of Helen as an excessively valued object of desire and the cause of the Trojan War† shows how women play a very powerful part in this book but as the same time they are represented as object being thrown around by men (Rynearson 4). Homer’s poem demonstrates how the women in the poem are recognized as objects and thrown around to different men because of different reasons. To begin with, The Iliad begins with Chryseis being captured by Agamemnon. Throughout the poem we see how there are different arguments that occur to get Chryseis back to her father who is Chryses. As Apollo was trying to help he killed soldiers because of a plague that was being sent to the Greeks.Show MoreRelatedAnalysis Of The Iliad 915 Words   |  4 Pagesto support this line. One such work of literature is Homerâ€℠¢s great epic, The Iliad. This poem, encompassing the telling of the great Trojan War, is one of the best examples of such a text. Throughout the text, it lays before the reader many separate scenes of violence, rather than grouping all of the battles together into one war like historic anthologies do. There are many scenes of violence throughout the poem, The Iliad, many of which contribute to the complete work, a small selection of these scenesRead MoreCritical Analysis Of The Iliad1714 Words   |  7 PagesHomer’s Iliad is an epic tale that spans centuries. The story covers intense battles in which the Greeks take on the Trojans. Homer does a fantastic job of bringing the poem to life and uses the gods to show the scale of the tale. While the poem is well written and grabs the reader’s attention, upon further analysis one can conclude that there is a serious problem concerning the tension between personal desire and rational ethical thinking. Throughout the book th is conflict appears time and timeRead MoreAnalysis Of The Iliad 1562 Words   |  7 PagesHomer’s epic, The Iliad, highlights the influence and jurisdiction that beauty provides. The prizes and glory a man accumulates from war measure his power, while beauty measures a woman’s power. Since conquering a woman is the ultimate prize to a man, her beauty represents ultimate power. Though the beauty of mortal women has the power to turn men against each other, mortal women have no influence over this power and are instead objectified by men. Immortal women, however, have authority over theirRead MoreAnalysis Of The Iliad 1208 Words   |  5 PagesTanzina Begum Bard High School Early College The Iliad – Homer Trans. By Robert Fagles Pride and Rage Warfare is, and always has been, the most appalling and yet most integral part of all human life. This is a truth that is displayed most ingeniously in Homer’s epic poem, The Iliad. In this epic, both mortals and gods alike are engulfed with the desire to best their enemy, even though pride and rage are what cloud their vision and fuel their actions. These seemingly harmless flaws carry greatRead MoreThe Iliad: Literary Analysis1552 Words   |  7 PagesThe Iliad: Literary Analysis Throughout The Iliad, an epic poem written by Homer, there were numerous warriors and other characters that could be looked upon as heroes; some of these heroes included Achilles, Ajax, Diomedes, Hector, and Glaucus. All of these individuals were heroes because of their remarkable mental and physical strength: they were courageous and were better fighters in war than other ordinary men. The trade of battle was a way of life to the Greeks back in Homer’s time. ChildrenRead MoreAnalysis Of Homer s Iliad 1382 Words   |  6 PagesRyan Doerhoff History of Greece Dr. Kirkland September 5, 2014 Document Analysis The primary documents that will be focused on in this analysis come from Homer’s Iliad. Homer is venerated today as the greatest of Greek epic poets, as his works had a colossal impact on the history of literature. Through his epics, Homer brings us first hand into the culture of the Greek world in the eighth century B.C. It is important to note that at this time very few had the privilege of an education, and lackedRead MoreLiterary Analysis Of The Iliad1050 Words   |  5 PagesThe Iliad is an ancient Greek epic that depicts the conflicts of the Trojan War. Throughout the story, many smaller arguments take place between the characters of the epic. Like all stories, The Iliad is filled with literary devices to allow the readers to garner a better understanding of the motivations of each character throughout encounters. Translators have to maintain the nuances of each situation while accounting for an unavoidable skewing from the original passage. In reality, this means t hatRead MoreThe Iliad Character Analysis914 Words   |  4 PagesContrasting Heroes in Homer’s â€Å"The Iliad† The term â€Å"foil† is a â€Å"character who contrasts with the protagonist in ways that bring out certain of his or her moral, emotional or intellectual qualities,† as defined by Sharon Hamilton (143). Achilles is the main hero of the â€Å"The Iliad†, a warrior who is angry and excluded. The contrasting and secondary hero is Hector. He is also a warrior and upcoming King of Troy who fights courageously for Troy. In his epic poem, â€Å"The Iliad,† Homer uses Hector as a foil toRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Iliad Essay1648 Words   |  7 Pagesthe Iliad, I would refuse to fight in this war. I don’t understand how there is not more discontent among the lower hierarchy of the army. I would not see the point of fighting simply to retrieve Menelaus’s ex-wife Helen; is it really worth giving up all of their lives to get her back? I understand that they were also concerned with heroism and honor, but to me fighting over such a simple disag reement doesn’t make much sense. That aspect, along with the inclusion of the gods makes the Iliad seemRead MoreAnalysis Of The Book The Iliad 965 Words   |  4 PagesSing, goddess, the anger of Peleus’ son Achilleus and its devastation, which put pains thousandfold upon the Achains,† (page 76 lines 1-7)This quote comes Richard Lattimore’s translated version of The Iliad, it tells the reader that Achilles is a man who is capable of great anger, anger that will kill thousands and bring much suffering. You wouldn’t think that a man like that would be able to feel anything but that anger, but in Christopher Logue’s War Music we see, â€Å"a naked man run with what seems

Citizen Kane An Accurate Portrayal of William Randolph Hearst Essay Example For Students

Citizen Kane: An Accurate Portrayal of William Randolph Hearst? Essay Many have called Citizen Kane the greatest cinematic achievement of all time. It is indeed a true masterpiece of acting, screen writing, and directing. Orson Welles, its young genius director, lead actor, and a co-writer, used the best talents and techniques of the day Bordwell 103 to tell the story of a newspaper giant, Charles Kane, through the eyes of the people who loved and hated him. However, when it came out, it was scorned by Hollywood and viewed only in the private theaters of RKO, the producer. Nominated for nine Academy Awards, it was practically booed off the stage, and only won one award, that for Best Screenplay, which Welles and Herman Mankiewicz shared Mulvey 10. This was all due to the pressure applied by the greatest newspaper man of the time, one of the most powerful men in the nation, the man Citizen Kane portrayed as a corrupt power monger, namely William Randolph Hearst. One cannot ignore the striking similarities between Hearst and Kane. In order to make clear at the outset exactly what he intended to do, Orson Welles included a few details about the young Kane that, given even a rudimentary knowledge of Hearstquot;s life, would have set one thinking about the life of that newspaper giant. Shortly after the film opens, a reporter is seen trying to discover the meaning of Kanequot;s last word, Rosebud. He begins his search by going through the records of Kanequot;s boyhood guardian, Thatcher. The scene comes to life in midwinter at the Kane boarding house. Kanequot;s mother has come into one of the richest gold mines in the world through a defaulting boarder, and at age twenty-five, Kane will inherit his sixty million dollars Citizen Kane. His mother is doubtful of the quality of the education her son will receive in Colorado, and therefore wishes to send her son to study with Thatcher. Hearstquot;s parents came by their money through gold mines Swanberg 5, so both Hearst and Kane were raised with golden spoons in their respective mouths. Kane is unusually devoted to his mother, as shown when he turns away from his father to listen to his mother, and when he only pays heed to his motherquot;s answers to his questions Citizen Kane. Hearst likewise was completely devoted to his mother. He was sheltered from the real world by his mother and her money for most of his young life, rarely even seeing his traveling father Swanberg 25. Also, Kanequot;s dying word and the name of his childhood sled, Rosebud, Citizen Kane was the name of a town twenty miles east of where Hearstquot;s parents were born and grew up Robinson 13. Everything from the newsreel at the start of the film on Kanequot;s life matches Hearstquot;s almost perfectly. Kane ran over thirty newspapers, radios, and syndicates, had a well publicized romantic affair, tried in vain to be elected to public office, was totally and completely careless with his money, always expecting there would be much more coming, and built himself a pleasure palace called Xanadu, which included a gigantic collection of statues and animals Citizen Kane. Hearst also did all these things over the course of his life, which further served to convince movie viewers of Wellesquot; libelous intentions in the making of the movie. Swanberg. After the opening newsreel on Hearstquot;s life, the movie goes through the boyhood scene where Thatcher takes Kane away from his parents. It then quickly shifts to a point twenty years later, when Kane is about to inherit the sixth largest private fortune in the world. Thatcher is concerned that Kane wonquot;t know his place in the world, and his fears are affirmed when Kane sends a telegram saying that he has no interest in gold mines or banks, but, rather, he would like to take over a small newspaper of which Thatcher has taken possession, the Morning Inquirer, because, I think it would be fun to write a newspaper. Citizen Kane The circumstances under which Hearst entered the newspaper world were very similar. Hearstquot;s father, a nearly illiterate mining tycoon, owned a newspaper in San Francisco, The Examiner, which he used as nothing more than a political organ to further his candidacy for a seat in Congress Swanberg 26. Against his fatherquot;s wishes for him to enter the world of mining, young Hearst took control of the paper to try to reverse his fatherquot;s enormous losses on it Swanberg 47. Both Hearst and Kane immediately began to revolutionize everything about their respective papers. Kane literally moved in to the office so that he might be constantly around his paper, constantly able to redo it at any hour, night or day. He makes it quite clear that, from now on, The Examiner was going to do more than just report what the current editor considered newsworthy. It was going to report all news, large or small, especially if it could be made into a sensation and sell newspapers. And if there was no current sensation, Kane would create the news. Hearst did the same thing, revolutionizing his paper to take on undignified topics to gain circulation, sporting shocking headlines and stories of crime and underwear. In a classic example of similarity, Kane nearly quoted Hearst exactly: You supply the prose and poems, Iquot;ll supply the war, Orson Wells, Citizen Kane as Kane discussed what to telegram back to a man in Cuba. Hearst was very much anti-Spanish dur ing the Cuban revolution, and if not for his efforts, it is probable that the war would not have even been fought. But Hearst, who would do anything for a headline, cooked up incredibly falsified tales of Spanish brutality. As stories of Cuban injustice became old news to the public, especially as there was no real war, a reporter telegraphed Hearst that he would like to leave. Hearst replied, Please remain. You furnish the pictures, Iquot;ll furnish the war. Swanberg 127 Such an obvious similarity can only have been deliberate, as Kane practically quoted Hearst. In the movie, Thatcher was furious with Kanequot;s success in attacking trusts in defense of the people and providing false headlines such as those about the Spanish Armada being anchored off of the Jersey coast, a headline printed with virtually no proof to substantiate it. Kane even used his paper to attack a company of which he himself, along with Thatcher, was the major shareholder. As Thatcher prepared to leave after his discussion with Kane on what new is, he mentioned to Kane his enormous losses, which totaled one million dollars for the year, a staggering sum to have been lost by one person, especially at that time. Kane,. however, laughed it off, joking that, at that rate, hequot;ll have to close down in sixty years Citizen Kane. All these things were characteristic of Hearst as well. He attacked the trusts in favor of the people a favorite phrase of Hearstquot;s and hired lawyers to try to get injunctions against the trusts and eventually destroy them. He supported the eight hour workday and the labor unions Swanberg 235. He made up headlines preying on peoplequot;s fear and hatred of Spain and Japan which, not coincidentally, he had aroused by previous articles in The Examiner and other publications of his about Spanish atrocities in Cuba and the yellow menace of Japan Swanberg 122, 352 Hearst threw money away as though to him it literally grew on trees. A man with an income of fifteen million dollars a year at the height of his power, he had almost no savings and sometimes had to borrow money Swanberg 88. Right after taking over The Inquirer, as told now by Bernstein, Kane ordered the editor to play up less important stories for the paper, the kinds of things that the nation wanted to see and read about, not just boring, plain news. He became very involved in the editorial content of his paper, constantly trying to make it better that the rest, staying up late, thinking of headlines and ideas for scoops. The Blanton Museum - Santo, San Antonio de Padau EssayHearst built San Simeon for Davies, to whom he was truly devoted Swanberg 447, unlike Kane and Susan. The latter couple eventually divorced after Susanquot;s speech in which she says that Kane had never giver anything to her, he had just tried to buy her into giving him something. Finally, with the point of view of Kanequot;s butler come two more similarities. Kane flew into violent rages when he didnquot;t get something he wanted, as when Susan left him and he said that fateful word for the first time, Rosebud. Kane was also a collector of everything, he threw nothing out, and was always buying something. Citizen Kane Hearst had the same bizarre practice. He would destroy thousands of dollars worth of antiques in a fit of anger and then spend one hundred thousand dollars on a passing whim. He never, however, threw anything out Swanberg 585. The movie closed on the scene of the resolution of the Rosebud puzzle. Among all the junk Kane had collected, lay a tiny wooden sled, the one from the day when Thatcher took him away from his mother, which was hauled off and thrown into the fire. Upon closer examination, the word Rosebud can be made out as it is slowly incinerated. Having taken into account the evidence presented above, it was clear that Orson Welles had based his movie around the life of William Randolph Hearst, a fact which upset Hearst to no end. In fact, a representative of the Hearst Organization offered eight hundred and forty two thousand dollars to RKO, the filmquot;s producer, if they would burn it. This plot having failed, RKO was blacklisted by the gigantic Hearst press and had to show the movie in private theaters. And yet, Welles still claimed that his movie had no intention of being biographical. He said, It is not based upon the life of Mr. Hearst or anyone else. On the other hand, had Mr. Hearst and similar financial barons not lived during the period we discuss, Citizen Kane could not have been made. Zinmen 238 In his life, Hearst ran many newspapers, as of course, did Kane. When he was still beginning, he owned four, and at the time he committed all of them to warring with Spain, as mentioned above. This singular, small event was the turning point in the life of a brilliant man and indeed the turning point of a nation. He had almost single handedly, using his power of the press, sent one of the most powerful nations in the world to war. The people of the United States had been manipulated wonderfully by the press to believe that Spain was such a menace that they must rally for war, even though it was all an invention by Hearst and his constituents to promote the newspaperquot;s circulation. If the press could do that, he believed it could do anything, even send a Mr. Hearst to the White House who had not the slightest experience as a political leader. And it very nearly did Swanberg 245. When he realized that his newspapers were a source of infinite power, that he could manipulate the people to get what he wanted, Hearst changed. His goals changed. His fight went from one for larger circulation to one for personal power, as much as he could get. He stopped being physically involved in his papers, as mentioned before, instead directing from his throne at San Simeon. He entered the political arena, where the ultimate prize lay, the ultimate investment of power in a single individual, the presidency. And yet again and again, by the voters or the corrupt bosses at Tammany Hall or by his many political enemies, he was defeated. His, like the story of Kane, was a story of constant personal failure due, as often as not. o his own faults However, things for Hearst were not always as bad as they were for Kane. Hearst did actually win public office once. He became a state representative of New York. This he accomplished with the backing of the Tammany Hall bosses and a Democratic constituency in the district. Beyond that he hurled his newspapers and money into the effort, earning a colossal victory over his opponent. However, Hearst was not content to be a Representative. He wanted to be president, had wanted to be president ever since he realized that he had a chance. He had wanted to be the biggest newspaper publisher in America, and he was. He had wanted Ms. Davies, and he had her and was devoted to her and spent millions for her entertainment. Everything which he had wanted he had received, in any way that he could think of at the moment. Orson Wellesquot; criticism of Hearst was the way in which he went about getting what he wanted, using his immense power over the people of the country simply to gain personal power. This is the overarching theme, portrayed so powerfully, in Citizen Kane. When Welles disclaimed any biographical intent, he did not pretend he was not depicting the forces that governed Hearstquot;s life. His newspapers changed drastically, and men spoke to him with reverence and fear, for his darker side had come to light. He enjoyed being king over his empire, watching his subjects squirm. With the building of his palace at San Simeon he only made concrete what many had known for a long time: William Randolph Hearst sat on a throne as the king of an empire which controlled the countryquot;s information. As brought out explicitly by the movie, Hearst wanted love, but not just the love of a few, the love of all. He needed whatever he wanted, and he wanted the peoplequot;s love. While Hearst was not the loveless monster Kane is portrayed as, he had many faults, the main one being that he often seemed to believe he could buy love. Welles attacked this belief heart and soul, claw and tooth in such scenes as when Leland returns the check with which Kane had hoped to preserve their friendship, now torn into shreds. Kane simply cannot fathom why he returned it, because he doesnquot;t realize that there is more to loving that gifts. Cowie 37 Hearst gave lavish parties and demonstrations to try to win people over to his side, and it often worked. He assailed his political opponents with his newspapers, attacking them in whatever way he could, transforming the newspapers from something he thought he loved into a tool with which he could get things, a bat he could swing at his opponents, a way to quench his thirst for money and power. Hearst was a man who discovered the power he controlled and then proceeded to abuse it, a practice Welles found intolerable. All in all, Orson Welles directed, starred in, and helped to write possibly the greatest film of all time, all to one purpose, to denounce William Randolph Hearst and all men who were abusive of power and the public trust. Why did he spend all this effort on this one man, an apparent crusader for the people, for the working man? Simply, it was because Hearst, for all his apparent love of the people, was only trying to get love and power for himself by abusing the most potent weapon and shield of his day, the free press. If I hadnquot;t been very rich, I might have been a really great man. Orson Welles, Citizen Kane

The analyzation of the Great Gatsby Essay Example For Students

The analyzation of the Great Gatsby Essay Myrtle Wilson searches for her identity through money. Myrtle evolves into another person when Tom exposes her to a lavish lifestyle. While throwing a party at the apartment she shares with Tom, Myrtle calls a nice dress she is complimented on a crazy old thing and says she slips it on when she doesnt care what she looks like. This statement coming from a woman who resides over a garage is obviously false. Myrtle becomes a spoiled little girl around Tom, acting almost giddy at times with the thought of being bought material possessions no matter what they are. We will write a custom essay on The analyzation of the Great Gatsby specifically for you for only $16.38 $13.9/page Order now While on an outing with Nick and Tom, Myrtle becomes very excited when she sees puppies on the side of the road and becomes girl like in her demand of the animal. The lack of emotion that Myrtle feels for her husband, who is poor, versus the affection she feel for Tom, who is rich attests to her obvious materialism. Myrtle claims it was a mistake for her to marry George Wilson. Myrtle complains about George frequently and refers to him as a breed not fit to lick her shoe. Clearly Myrtle resents the fact that George is not successful and is therefore of little value to her. Tom Buchanan searches for his identity through love. His sexual conquests are obvious attempts to compensate for the love that does not exist in his marriage to Daisy. Tom desperately wants the love of his wife but has to settle for her loyalty. Tom has come to the conclusion that Daisy will never love him. Her marriage to Tom is one of convenience. Tom represents prestige, companionship, and most of all wealth. Their wedding day was one filled with pomp and circumstance; Tom knew from the beginning that his actions needed to be extreme and lavish. Toms wife cant live without wealth; his attempts to please her are to make her love him. After finding out about Daisys affair with Gatsby, Tom recalls a tender moment when he carries Daisy down from the Punch Bowl to keep her shoes dry. Tom became fearful of loosing his wife when he hears of her other relationship; he wants her to love only him. Tom has hopes and desires for the love that could only come from Daisy. Daisy Buchanan searches for her identity through money. Daisys quest to remain at the level in society that she has known all of her life prevents her from choosing a man she loves because he is socially unacceptable. Jordan recalls finding Daisy in a drunken stooper clutching in her hand a letter from Gatsby. Daisy mumbles that she has changed her mind about marrying Tom, yet after sobering up continues with the ceremony not mentioning the incident again. Daisy makes her choice of a husband who was socially more acceptable and decided to forego any possibility of love. I feel Daisy would have never been satisfied; she marries a man who has money and is miserable without love; but had Daisy married Gatsby when she had the opportunity she would have probably been unhappy with out the riches. I have discussed mans search for identity as the theme in The Great Gatsby by F. Scott Fitzgerald. In doing so, I noticed that the characters in this novel never once look inside themselves for contentment. The characters I have discussed, and other in this unique, enter twining novel seek to make themselves hole by attaining sexual conquests, material possessions, and above all wealth. Not surprisingly, none of the characters ever get what they want out of life. Gatsby wants the love of Daisy and instead ends up dead; Myrtle sought to hold on to her rich lover and ends up dead; Tom and Daisy stay unhappily married.